Legal Opinion

Sala & Ruthe Realty, Inc. v. Deneen

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1973No. 6836PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Batjer, J.:

The appellant brought suit in district court to recover an alleged broker’s fee. The claimed fee was based upon appellant’s allegation that it had presented a ready, willing and able buyer whose purchase was frustrated by acts of the sellers. After a trial before the court, sitting without a jury, judgment was entered for the respondents and against the appellant and this appeal follows.

Respondent, Robert W. McMackin, owned 85 percent and respondent, Charles C. Deneen, owned 15 percent of certain real property located in Clark County, Nevada. On January 9, 1969,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brandon v. TravitskyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Allen v. WebbNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lanigir v. ArdenNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Close v. RedeliusNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Engel v. WilcoxNevada Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shupe v. HamNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Tavel v. OlssonNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Alrich v. BaileyNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Aikins v. AndrewsNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Cavell v. CavellNevada Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API