Legal Opinion

Panosyan v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 31, 2017No. 4D15-2508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of foreclosure, but reverse and remand for a determination of the correct amounts owed in interest and escrow advances because those awards were not proven by competent substantial evidence.

The total amount of damages sought by Bank was $258,213.36, which included amounts for the principal balance, interest, and the escrow advance balance. To prove ’ these damages, Bank introduced two' loan payment histories and had one- of its witnesses read from the proposed final judgment not admitted into evidence.

We conclude the principal ' balance awarded in the final judgment was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Natacha Peuguero and Angelo Peuguero v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Harutyun Hovannesian v. Pennymac Corp. and Teni HovannesianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael Newman, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joel Newman, and Edith Newman v. American Home Assurance Company, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API