Harutyun Hovannesian v. Pennymac Corp. and Teni Hovannesian

We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure in part, concluding that PennyMac -had standing to enforce the Note and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a loan acquisition screenshot into evidence. However, because certain categories of damages awarded in the final judgment were not proven by competent substantial evidence, we reverse and remand for a determination of the correct amounts owed.

The evidence of damages at trial consisted of the loan payment history and Penny-Mac’s witness’s testimony that the figures in the proposed final judgment were accurate. The…