Legal Opinion

Waukegan Port District v. Kyritsis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 9, 1984No. 2—83—0998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopf

Plaintiff, Waukegan Port District (Waukegan), appeals from an order of the circuit court of Lake County entered in this eminent domain proceeding. This order, entered after trial and after judgment had been entered, provided that defendants Christine Kyritsis et al. were entitled to interest based on the rate for United States treasury bills on the $100,000 awarded them as just compensation for Waukegan’s taking of their property.

The issue raised on appeal concerns whether the trial court properly allowed interest on the award in excess of the 6% figure set forth by statute (Ill. Rev. Stat.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  2. United States v. Dorothy Blankinship, United States of America v. Dorothy BlankinshipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. Department of Transportation v. RasmussenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Epling v. DicksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Chicago Housing Authority v. LámarIllinois Supreme Court · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API