Legal Opinion

Conkey v. Conder

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1894No. 16,755PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.

This was an action by appellant against appellees.

The complaint was in two paragraphs.

The first paragraph was in the nature of an equity proceeding to enjoin the collection of a judgment and to have the judgment declared null and void.

In the second paragraph there was a demand to have the judgment set aside and the case reopened, with leave to defend against the claim of appellees.

The judgment sought to be set aside had been obtained in 1882, by appellees against appellant and his co-partner, James Donegan; and the reason given for claiming that the judgment should be held void is that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Turnbull v. PaysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Painter v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Deming v. BullittIndiana Supreme Court · 1823
  4. State v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Allen v. ThaxterIndiana Supreme Court · 1825

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburg Railroad v. WolcottIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Green v. Robertshaw-Fulton Controls CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1962
  3. 4 Fidelity Building & Savings Union v. ByrdIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Watson v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. UnderwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API