Pratt v. Vencor, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WISEMAN, J.
This case is like a bottle of fine California Chardonnay— very dry. It addresses a purely procedural question of the “trigger date” for the commencement of the 60-day time period within which the court must rule on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) when there is no corresponding motion for a new trial. We publish to resolve the contention that there is ambiguity in the language of Code of Civil Procedure sections 629 and 660 1 in determining the latest date for ruling on a JNOV motion.
We hold, pursuant to sections 629 and 660, that where there is no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Sun Pacific Farming Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Dills v. Redwoods Associates, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coburn v. SievertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Church v. JamisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Lingenfelter v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Simon v. Walt Disney World Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Lingenfelter v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007