Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Vencor, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 2003No. F038462PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WISEMAN, J.

This case is like a bottle of fine California Chardonnay— very dry. It addresses a purely procedural question of the “trigger date” for the commencement of the 60-day time period within which the court must rule on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) when there is no corresponding motion for a new trial. We publish to resolve the contention that there is ambiguity in the language of Code of Civil Procedure sections 629 and 660 1 in determining the latest date for ruling on a JNOV motion.

We hold, pursuant to sections 629 and 660, that where there is no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Sun Pacific Farming Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Dills v. Redwoods Associates, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coburn v. SievertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Church v. JamisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Lingenfelter v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Simon v. Walt Disney World Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Lingenfelter v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API