Hand v. Cole
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in eri’or from Circuit Court of Davidson County. W. K. McAlisteR, J.
1Opinion of the CourtEolKES, J.
This is an action at law to recover of the defendants, individually, the wages claimed to be 'due plaintiff by the Nashville Plow Company, an insolvent manufacturing corporation, chartered under Section 11 of the . Q-eneral Incorporation Act of 1875.
Under the case as made in the record, the only question presented is, whether the plaintiff, who was a traveling salesman or drummer in the employ of the company, can claim • the benefit of said Act, as being one of the persons in favor of whom the Legislature has given an individual right of recourse over upon the stockholder.
Section 11 of said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wakefield v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Sleeper v. GoodwinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- White v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Brockway v. InnesMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Ericsson v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by7 opinions
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Tradesman Publishing Co. v. Car Wheel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Fletcher v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Tennessee Valley Appliances, Inc. v. RowdenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Pilger v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.