Legal Opinion

Laidlaw v. Sage

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by William K. Laidlaw, Jr., against Bussell Sage, for personal injuries. The complaint was dismissed at the trial, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

This action was brought to recover damages because of certain alleged wrongful acts of the defendant. The answer admitted some of the acts, but denied that any wrong had been done by the defendant to the plaintiff. The facts appearing upon the trial seem to be substantially as follows: The plaintiff had for a number of years been accustomed to call upon the defendant at his office on business two or three times a week, and sometimes oftener. On the morning of the 4th ■ of December, 1891, he went to call on the defendant, at the request of. his employer. Upon "entering the office occupied by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ring v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laidlaw v. SageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Laidlaw v. SageNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API