Legal Opinion

Laidlaw v. Sage

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by William R Laidlaw against Russell Sage to recover damages alleged to have resulted from defendant’s wrongful act. ■ From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff fo'r $25,000, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

None of the objections to the judgment and order appealed from which appear upon the brief of the counsel for the appellant need any further consideration than such points received upon the previous appeal in this case; but an examination of the record discloses questions which have been raised during the progress of the trial which resulted in the judgment and order appealed from, and which, although not noticed upon this appeal by the counsel for the appellant, or called to the attention of the court, would undoubtedly be discovered by him in ample time to present the same to the court of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Laidlaw v. SageNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Laidlaw v. SageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API