Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. New York City Housing Authority
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 8, 1957No. 82, Docket 24196PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEDINA, Circuit Judge.
This case was tried below on an agreed statement of facts. Caruso-Sturcey Corporation contracted on June 21, 1949 with the New York City Housing Authority to install heating and ventilating facilities on a housing project. The contract required Caruso to give a performance bond, not involved in this litigation, and a payment bond for laborers and materialmen. This the contractor did when it executed the bonds on July 11, 1949 with Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland.
When the heating and ventilating facilities had been installed and accepted by the owner on March 1,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. AcriSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Maria Elisa Rodriguez v. Escambron Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- City of New York and the Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- James E. Folsom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Central Surety And Insurance Corporation v. Martin Infante Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.