Legal Opinion

Brunnelle v. Kerr

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 2, 1983No. 82-C-698PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHABAZ, District Judge.

Petitioner, currently confined at the Federal Correctional Institution, Oxford, Wisconsin, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He attacks various actions of United States Parole Commission (Commission) in setting his parole date.

FACTS

The Court finds the following facts to be undisputed:

1. On July 22, 1974, petitioner was sentenced to a twenty-five year term of imprisonment for bank robbery.

2. In 1980, petitioner applied with the Commission for parole.

3. On January 20, 1981, petitioner appeared before a panel of hearing examiners for an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Shango v. JurichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Ramesh Solomon v. Robert I. Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ernest Castaldo v. United States Parole Commission and George Rodgers, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Englewood, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. Gregory J. Wentz v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Romey v. VanyurDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1998
  4. United States v. GardinerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1987
  5. Sheppard v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API