Legal Opinion

Brown v. Dorfman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Plaintiff, who alleged that the defendant without authority constructed sewer works upon her land, appeals from a judgment on a directed verdict for the defendant.

The complaint attempts to allege a cause of action under ORS 105.005. Under that statute, one having the present right to possession of land may combine with a prayer for the possession of the land a prayer for damages for trespass. See Trotter v. Town of Stayton, 45 Or 301, 77 P 395 (1904); Starr v. Stark, 7 Or 500 (1879).

Since the defendant has not asserted that the construction of sewer lines upon the land of another is not an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Douglas v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Trotter v. Town of StaytonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Williams v. Goose Lake Valley Irr. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Starr v. StarkOregon Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Hook v. HornerIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Sutherlin School District 130 v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. O'HARA v. BraceOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. GYMNASTICS USA v. McDougalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API