Legal Opinion

Briody v. Village of Lewiston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: The court improperly dismissed the first through sixth and the eighth causes of action. Because of the failure to comply with the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), petitioners-plaintiffs are entitled to judgment declaring that the following actions are void: the granting of the option by the Village of Lewiston and the Town of Lewiston to defendant-respondent Atherton and the conveyance of the property…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sun-Brite Car Wash, Inc. v. Board of Zoning & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Har Enterprises v. Town of BrookhavenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Tri-County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Town Board of QueensburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Sun Beach Real Estate Development Corp. v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Beach Real Estate Development Corp. v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. Board of Trustees of the Village of BlasdellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Billerbeck v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Benvenuto v. Village of MillertonNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  4. O'Keeffe v. BonelliNew York Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API