Legal Opinion

Conaway v. Gore

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Rice Distriet Court. Action of forcible entry and detainer, brought by Conaway against Gore and Reed. Trial at the June Term, 1878, of the district court, and judgment for defendants. Conaway and wife bring the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

Plaintiffs commenced an action of forcible-entry and detainer. After judgment before a justice of the-peace, defendants appealed to the district court, and upon-trial a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence was sustained, and the case is now here for review. The question is as to the-sufficiency of the plaintiff’s notice to quit, and the time when any defects therein can be taken advantage of. The notice-to quit is in these words:

“To John M. L. Gore and James W. Reed: You are hereby notified and required to forthwith leave the premises…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nason v. BestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Oklahoma City v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  2. Vansellous v. HueneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API