Legal Opinion

In re the Construction of the Last Will & Testament of Strasenburgh

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 7, 1928PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Feeley, S.

Since this testator’s death, certain dividends have been declared and become payable on the stock of a corporation founded and conducted by him in his lifetime and known as the R. J. Strasenburgh Company. By his last will, dated June 19, 1925, he made three bequests of shares in this corporation — to his son, and to two of his associates prominent in his business, respectively — in form and language that is the same in each legacy, save for the name of the legatee and number of shares — the 3d clause, for example, being as follows: “ I give and bequeath unto my son, Edwin G.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Tifft v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. In Re the Accounting of Security Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Holmes v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Walton v. WaltonNew York Court of Chancery · 1823

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Buck v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In re the Estate of BakerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of LiellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  4. Wolder v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. Hastings College v. ReesNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API