Legal Opinion

Andino v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Evidence adduced at petitioner’s Tier III disciplinary hearing, including the written misbehavior report and testimony from two physicians, constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139). Petitioner offered no evidence to support his bald assertion that he was unable to comply with the order directing him to provide a urine sample (see, Matter of Pabon v LeFevre, 124 AD2d 310). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Pabon v. LeFevreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API