Legal Opinion

SAR AH M ARTIN, et al. v. BRIAN BINGAMAN, et al.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided December 19, 2025No. 4:23-cv-01037Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SAR AH M A RTIN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 4:23-CV-1037-RHH ) BRIAN BINGAMAN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants Centurion of Missouri, LLC (“Centurion”) and Cassandra Hosea, LPN’s (“Hosea”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint with prejudice. (ECF No. 85.) The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. For the reasons stated below, the Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. Background For…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Brian Ulrich v. Pope CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API