Legal Opinion
Krieger v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided July 13, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonald E. Coleman, J.
The claim was duly filed and has not been submitted to any other court or tribunal for audit or determination. The claim is for deprivation of claimant’s rights. It is made under section 1983 of title 42 of the United States Code which reads as follows:
“ § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights “ Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Warren Jobson v. Frank R. Henne, Edward D. Stevenson, Murray Bergman and Michael SemchyshynCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brody v. P. J. LeamyNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Dale v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Judo, Inc. v. PeetCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
- Arahovitis v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1983
- Estate of Buzzelle v. Colorado State HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971