Legal Opinion
Judo, Inc. v. Peet
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided November 9, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard S. Lane, J.
These motions are considered together and raise for the first time in New York the question of whether, for the purposes of a civil action pursuant to section 1983 of title 42 of the United States 'Code, sewer service constitutes a deprivation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States.
Plaintiff sued defendant for the balance due under a contract to take judo lessons and obtained a default judgment. After having her default opened, defendant interposed an answer wherein she alleges, by way of counterclaims against plaintiff and as a complaint against third-party defendants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Testa v. KattSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dr. Harold D. Kletschka v. William J. Driver, Individually and as Administrator of the Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Barbara A. Nesmith and Richard A. Nesmith v. H. D. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brody v. P. J. LeamyNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Waltentas v. LipperDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Dudley v. Genesee County SheriffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Carrasco v. KleinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- Colvin v. BowenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.