Legal Opinion
Bradler v. Craig
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1969No. Civ. 33310PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchweitzer, Acting P.J.
By their second amended complaint, plaintiffs seek damages for alleged negligent construction of a house against the general contractor, C. Dick Craig, and the construction and purchase money lender, Santa Barbara Savings and Loan Association. General demurrers, filed by both defendants, were sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiffs failed to amend within the time allowed by the court and the action was dismissed as to these defendants. (Code Civ. Proc., § 581, subd. 3.) Plaintiffs appeal from the separate judgments of dismissal.
The Pleadings(1) The Complaint. The complaint alleges that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Parker v. Columbia BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Francioni v. Gibsonia Truck Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- The Gates Rubber Company, a Corporation v. Usm Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.