Legal Opinion

Martin v. Staples

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 10, 1947No. 9476PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal was taken from a jury’s verdict before judgment had been entered. It is therefore premature and must be dismissed. St. Louis Amusement Co. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp., 8 Cir., 156 F.2d 400; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 58, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. However, we have examined the record and find that the judgment would be affirmed if it were before us. Appellant is the beneficiary of a will which has been denied probate because the jury found that the will had been procured by undue influence, duress, or coercion. Appellant, conceding .that thé…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Louis Amusement Co. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MasonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Walter F. O'Brien v. Russell C. Harrington, Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Roe Village, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. State v. MasonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API