Legal Opinion
Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 30, 2013PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
This is an appeal from the order of the Superior Court reversing the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, which held appellee Harleysville Insurance Company did not suffer prejudice as a result of appellant’s failure to report a phantom vehicle within the 30-day time requirement established by the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL).1 Upon review, we affirm the Superior Court decision.
*1062This case involves an uninsured motorist benefits claim filed in connection with injuries allegedly sustained by appellant in an October 4, 2001, motor…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Generette v. Donegal Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Morales v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Nationwide Insurance v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Metal Bank of America, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Intech Metals, Inc. v. Meyer, Wagner & JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Goddard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Allegheny Energy Supply v. Wolf Run Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- CONSTRUCTION FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES LLC v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Collier, R. v. Balzer, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.