Intech Metals, Inc. v. Meyer, Wagner & Jacobs
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
RANSOM, J.:
Intech Metals, Inc. (“Intech Metals”), Valform, Inc. (“Valform”), and David J. Hanlin (“Hanlin”) (collectively, Appellants) appeal from the order entered February 8, 2016, denying their petition to open a judgment of non pros. We affirm.
The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows. Hanlin retained Thomas Wagner, Esquire (“Attorney Wagner”) and the law firm of Meyer, Wagner & Jacobs, P.C. (collectively, Appellees) to draft documents regarding the formation of Intech Metals with Richard Phillips in December 1984. See PI. Amended Compl., 8/19/1998, at ¶¶ 7—8;…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Marino v. HackmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Madrid v. ALPINE MOUNTAIN CORP.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Manson v. First National Bank in IndianaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- A.D. Brown v. DuganCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- B.E. Divine a/k/a B. Darnell v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Bentlejewski, D. v. WoodbridgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Grimm, R. v. Grimm, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Petermann, J. v. Kettering, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.