Legal Opinion

Intech Metals, Inc. v. Meyer, Wagner & Jacobs

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2016No. 374 WDA 2016PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

RANSOM, J.:

Intech Metals, Inc. (“Intech Metals”), Valform, Inc. (“Valform”), and David J. Hanlin (“Hanlin”) (collectively, Appellants) appeal from the order entered February 8, 2016, denying their petition to open a judgment of non pros. We affirm.

The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows. Hanlin retained Thomas Wagner, Esquire (“Attorney Wagner”) and the law firm of Meyer, Wagner & Jacobs, P.C. (collectively, Appellees) to draft documents regarding the formation of Intech Metals with Richard Phillips in December 1984. See PI. Amended Compl., 8/19/1998, at ¶¶ 7—8;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Marino v. HackmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Madrid v. ALPINE MOUNTAIN CORP.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Manson v. First National Bank in IndianaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A.D. Brown v. DuganCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. B.E. Divine a/k/a B. Darnell v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Bentlejewski, D. v. WoodbridgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Grimm, R. v. Grimm, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Petermann, J. v. Kettering, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API