Legal Opinion
David v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 5, 2008No. 99-CM-1741PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellant appeals from a conviction of simple assault (D.C.Code § 22-504 (Supp. 1999)) entered by the trial court after a one-day bench trial. Due to an equipment error, certain parts of the trial were not recorded: the arguments and ruling on appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal, and the direct testimony and cross-examination of appellant’s only witness, who was also the complainant (the redirect and recross examinations were transcribed). Although the trial court reconstructed the missing portion of the transcript in the form of a Settled and Approved Statement…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Henry SelvaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- United States v. Eddie UpshawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- CHARLES S. TURNER,CHRISTOPHER D. TURNER,RUSSELL L. OVERTON, LEVY ROUSE, CLIFTON E. YARBOROUGH, KELVIN D. SMITH, & TIMOTHY CATLETTDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Lewis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- JOEL CASTON v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Egbuka v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Charles A. Grant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.