Legal Opinion

Hall v. Cottingham

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 27, 1931No. 328PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.

The plaintiffs brought this case for an accounting against the defendant Cottingham as administrator and guardian and the surety on his bond. By consent, the case was referred to a special master to hear and determine all issues, reserving however to the court tho right to review any ruling upon exceptions, with the power to modify, reverse, or affirm the report in whole or in part. The special master has filed his report, and the plaintiffs and the defendant Cottingham and the surety on his bond have filed exceptions.

It will be unnecessary to discuss in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Oxley v. SweetlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  3. Town of Fairfax ex rel. Barringer v. HublerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Equitable Trust Co. v. SchwebelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API