Akin v. Bonfils
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Blaine County ; W. C. 'Crow, Assigned Judge. Action by F. G. Bonfils and another against Lee A. Akin. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
M1LEY, J.
This action was commenced in the district court by defendants in error, F. G. Bonfils and E. P. Kelly, as plaintiffs, and against the plaintiff in error, Lee A. Akin, as defendant, to recover possession and damages for the use and occupation of Ihe west % of the northwest %, section 25, township 15, range 11, situated in Blaine county, Okla. There was a final judgment for the plaintiffs, to reverse which tliis proceeding in. error is prosecuted. The parties will be designated as they were in the trial court.
But one question is presented for our decision in this case, and that arises…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Stark v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Perry v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- McDuffie v. Geiser Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Woodworth, County Clerk v. Town of HennesseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Charles Casto v. The Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Empire Oil & Refining Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Barnett v. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Dill v. FlesherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.