Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Disciplinary Proceedings Against Felli

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2005No. 2003AP1333-DPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J.

¶ 33. (concurring in part, dissenting in part). I join the court's decision and order as to the discipline imposed in this action. I write separately because I disagree with the court that full costs should be imposed in this case. For the reasons stated in my concurring in part, dissenting in part, opinions in In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Polich, 2005 WI 36, 279 Wis. 2d 266, 694 N.W.2d 367, and In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Backes, 2005 WI 59, 281 Wis. 2d 1, 697 N.W.2d 49, because Attorney Felli was absolved of any misconduct in the matter involving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. PolichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against BackesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API