Legal Opinion

Barbour v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided August 7, 1956No. Civ. A. 3470PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUERGENS, District Judge. .

Plaintiff, Richard E. Barbour, husband <of Marjorie L. Barbour, filed suit against the two above named defendants, charging the Bottling Company with carelessly ■and negligently (1) filling and capping ■“said bottle, or one or more of them” .so as to cause the same to explode when ■*■ * * the same was being handled; (2) filling “weak and insecure bottles”; ■(3) placing “said bottles in weak and unsafe” cardboard containers whereby they “would be caused to strike against •one another and an explosion of one or more of said bottles would result”; (4) placing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stephens v. WeigelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  2. Chicago & Milwaukee Electric Railway Co. v. KrempelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  3. Blair v. Bloomington & Normal Railway, Electric & Heating Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1962
  2. Bahler v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Wolff v. Du PuisOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Nicholson v. BlanchetteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. McCoy v. Colonial Baking Co. Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API