Pinto Valley Copper Corp. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Presiding Judge.
This appeal requires us to construe A.R.S. § 23-733(A) which is the section of Arizona’s Employment Security Act, A.R.S. §§ 23-601 to 23-799 (Act) which requires a successor employer to make unemployment compensation fund contributions which reflect the experience rating of the predecessor employer. Given the legislature’s clear intention to protect Arizona’s workers from the burdens of involuntary unemployment and the numerous references throughout the unemployment compensation statutes to employment and employers within this state, we conclude that A.R.S. §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc. v. WaitmanArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Cornwall Industries, Inc. v. Maine Department of Manpower Affairs, Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Levy v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Warehouse Indemnity Corp. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Kane v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greves v. Ohio State Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- L & CP Corp. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Premier Physicians Group, PLLC v. NavarroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Conference Resource Specialists of Arizona, Inc. v. Department of Economic Security Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001