Legal Opinion
Young v. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 5, 2003No. 02-2518PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Michael Young, also known as Anthony Pryor, appeals the district court order dismissing his action construed as filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, Young filed an action against Michigan Department of Corrections Officials Bill Martin, Bruce Curtis, and Dan Bolden. Young alleged that prison staff: (1) violated his Eighth Amendment rights by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ronnie Burton v. Wendee JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Demetrius Knuckles El Errick E. Payton-Bey Michael Vaughn v. Raymond G. Toombs, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Coffin v. ReichardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Wright v. LazaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Adams 268663 v. HortonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020
- Adams 389698 v. JacksonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020
- Allen 227969 v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020
- Allen 732946 v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.