Legal Opinion
Wright v. Lazaroff
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 25, 2009No. 1:07cv1022PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on May 15, 2009 (Doc. 46).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bennett v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Hennis v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Hillman v. ShoopDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Jefferson v. TurnerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Johnson v. Warden Allen Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.