Legal Opinion

In Re Powell's Estate

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1943No. 3392Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEYS

November 10, 1943 142 P.2d 893.

OPINION

This is a motion to substitute W.E. Baldy in the place and stead of John V. Copren and Arthur A. Platz as attorney for appellant.

The administratrix has filed an affidavit making certain charges against the present attorneys, and Mr. Copren has filed herein an affidavit denying the said charges. We are not called upon in this proceeding to pass upon the merits or demerits of said controversy, because we believe that under the provisions of the second paragraph of section 601 N.C.L. appellant is given the right to change her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. State v. PlunkettNevada Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Estate of CazaurangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Jacobus v. JacobusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API