Hardley v. State

OPINION

BRADFORD, Judge.

Appellant/Defendant Samuel Hardley appeals from his convictions of and sentences imposed for Class D felony Criminal Confinement1 and Class A misdemean- or Battery.2 Hardley contends that the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction for criminal confinement and that that conviction and his battery conviction violate prohibitions against double jeopardy. The State cross-appeals, contending that the trial court erred in ordering sentences Hardley received in two different cause numbers to be served concurrently. We affirm in part, reverse in…