Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Goldstein

New York Marine Court

Decided December 15, 1882Published

Motion by defendant for an order discontinuing the action.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

A few days after this action was commenced, the plaintiff assigned his cause of action to one Peckham, who has since signed a consent that the action be discontinued without costs. The plaintiff’s attorney assented to the assignment. This put *484the legal title to the claim in Peckham, and made him the real party in interest in the action (47 N. Y. 345 ; 10 Barb. 573 ; 14 N. Y. 322).

Being the real party in interest, he has the right to control the action, and direct what proceedings shall or shall not be taken therein, and when the real party in interest on one side, agrees with the party…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eaton v. . AlgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Durgin v. . Ireland and PrudenNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Combs v. BatemanNew York Supreme Court · 1850

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API