Legal Opinion

Durgin v. . Ireland and Pruden

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1856PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The condition, upon which the payment of fifty per cent of the amount of the note was to operate as a satisfaction of the whole sum, was not performed. The payment was, by the agreement, to be a full satisfaction, provided all the other creditors agreed to a similar composition, but not otherwise. It was not pretended in the answer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Small v. MottCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  2. Meyers v. BettsNew York Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Castleman-Blakemore Co. v. Pickrell & Craig Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Bank of Commerce v. HoeberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Goldenbergh v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Huwer v. . DannenhofferNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. The Clara A. McIntyreDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API