Durgin v. . Ireland and Pruden
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The condition, upon which the payment of fifty per cent of the amount of the note was to operate as a satisfaction of the whole sum, was not performed. The payment was, by the agreement, to be a full satisfaction, provided all the other creditors agreed to a similar composition, but not otherwise. It was not pretended in the answer…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Small v. MottCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Meyers v. BettsNew York Supreme Court · 1847
3Cited by11 opinions
- Castleman-Blakemore Co. v. Pickrell & Craig Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Bank of Commerce v. HoeberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879
- Goldenbergh v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Huwer v. . DannenhofferNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- The Clara A. McIntyreDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.