In re the Marriage of Langan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
In this appeal from a dissolution judgment, wife contends that the trial court erred in awarding a disproportionate share of the parties’ property to husband and in treating her pending personal injury claim as a marital asset. On appeal, we modify the judgment and affirm it as modified. We affirm on husband’s cross-appeal.1
This 12-year marriage was the second for both husband and wife. He is 50, and she is 46. Both are in good health. The parties’ educational levels are approximately the same; each has limited vocational training, husband’s in auto repair and wife’s in secretarial work.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Matter of Marriage of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Matter of Marriage of Olinger and OlingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- In the Matter of Marriage of Crislip and CrislipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Marriage of Wolhaupter-HeinzelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- In re the Marriage of MasseeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- In re the Marriage of PughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- In Re the Marriage of DayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- In re the Marriage of PetermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.