Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Langan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 27, 1988No. 15-85-04793; CA A39557PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

In this appeal from a dissolution judgment, wife contends that the trial court erred in awarding a disproportionate share of the parties’ property to husband and in treating her pending personal injury claim as a marital asset. On appeal, we modify the judgment and affirm it as modified. We affirm on husband’s cross-appeal.1

This 12-year marriage was the second for both husband and wife. He is 50, and she is 46. Both are in good health. The parties’ educational levels are approximately the same; each has limited vocational training, husband’s in auto repair and wife’s in secretarial work.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Matter of Marriage of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Matter of Marriage of Olinger and OlingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. In the Matter of Marriage of Crislip and CrislipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of Wolhaupter-HeinzelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. In re the Marriage of MasseeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. In re the Marriage of PughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. In Re the Marriage of DayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. In re the Marriage of PetermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API