Legal Opinion

Kingston Environmental Services, Inc., United States for the use and benefit of v. David Boland, Inc.

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided November 20, 2019No. 1:16-cv-00205Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I UNITED STATES, for the use and Case No. 16-cv-00205-DKW-WRP benefit of KINGSTON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED Plaintiff, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT vs. DAVID BOLAND, INC., et al., Defendants. This action arises out of an infrastructure construction project at Wheeler Army Airfield in Oahu, Hawaii. The prime contractor hired by the federal government, Defendant David Boland, Inc., retained Plaintiff Kingston Environmental Services, Inc., as a subcontractor to perform part of the work. By…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API