Francis v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DeBRULER, Justice.
Appellant Francis was tried to a jury and found guilty of incest, a Class D felony. 1.C. 85-46-1-3(a) He was given a two-year sentence, which was enhanced by thirty years pursuant to a finding that he is a habitual offender. 1C. 85-50-2-8. Francis appeals his conviction and asserts as one of five bases of error that the trial court erred in denying his motion to correct errors in the face of exculpatory evidence discovered subsequent to his conviction. Because we find that the newly discovered evidence does require the reversal of appellant's conviction, we do not reach his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Augustine v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Moredock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Bustamante v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Fox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Lyles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Thomas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.