Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Mutual Insurance & Fennimore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied petitioner’s application to stay arbitration of respondent’s claim for underinsurance benefits. Respondent was required to assert her claim "within 90 days or as soon as practicable”; that requirement "called for a determination of what was within a reasonable time in the light of the facts and circumstances of the case at hand” (Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co., 47 NY2d 12, 19). Respondent offered a reasonable excuse for her delay in asserting the claim for coverage (cf., Schiebel v Nationwide Mut. Ins.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mighty Midgets, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Schiebel v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EdgersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. MancusoNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Insurance Enterprise & LeavyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API