Legal Opinion
Schiebel v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 9, 1990PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company is required to provide underinsurance coverage to the plaintiff, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), entered March 8, 1989, which, after a nonjury trial, was in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiffs complaint.
Ordered that the judgment appealed from is modified, by adding thereto a provision declaring that the defendant is not required to provide underinsurance coverage to the plaintiff; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Eveready Insurance v. SaundersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Merchants Mutual Insurance v. HurbanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Nassau Insurance v. DoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by19 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EdgersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Nationwide Insurance v. MontopoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Elkowitz v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DiGregorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.