Legal Opinion
Bynum v. Prudential Residential Services, Ltd. Partnership
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided March 11, 2004No. 01-02-00747-CVPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.
On this day, the Court considered appellants’ motion for rehearing. The motion is DENIED. However, we withdraw our previous opinion of November 10, 2003, and issue this opinion in its stead. Our judgment of November 10, 2003, remains unchanged.
Appellants, Jimmy and Hillary Bynum, individually and as next friends of their minor children, Thomas and Clark Bynum, sued various Prudential entities, 1 R & R Inspection Service, Peverely Engineering Inc., Ray Kindsfather, and John and Susan McNamara, appellees, asserting claims of breach of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Fredonia State Bank v. General American Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Tyler v. SloaneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Owens v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2008
- Williams v. Dardenne, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Bossier Chrysler Dodge II, Inc. v. Rauschenberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- Welwood v. Cypress Creek Estates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Van Duren v. ChifeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.