Legal Opinion

Finnegan v. Welker

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided October 29, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00823Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION RUSSELL GRANT FINNEGAN, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:21-CV-823-JD-MGG MARY WELKER, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Russell Grant Finnegan, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Hukic v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API