Legal Opinion
Riley v. Town of Bethlehem
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided May 19, 1998No. 1:97-cv-01788PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
MCAVOY, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are motions for summary judgment by the defendants, and a cross-motion for a preliminary injunction by the plaintiff.
This case presents yet another example of what has become an almost habitual failure on the part of litigants in this district to recognize the importance of a proper Local Rule 7.1(f) Statement on a summary judgment motion. It therefore presents the Court with another opportunity to emphasize that importance.
Rule 7.1(f) of the Local Rules for the Northern District of New York provides as follows:
On a motion for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Mary Nell Little v. Cox's SupermarketsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Cossack v. BurnsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
3Cited by12 opinions
- Monahan v. New York City Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Phipps v. New York State Department of LaborDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Osier v. Broome CountyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Badlam v. Reynolds Metals Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Monahan v. New York City Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.