Legal Opinion

Ollie Warren v. G. v. Richardson, Warden F.C.I., Lompoc, California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1964No. 19135PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

Ollie Warren, having been convicted and sentenced in federal court on his plea of guilty of the offense of breaking or attempting to break into a post' office in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2115, applied for a writ of habeas corpus. Treating the application as one for relief under 28 U. S.C. § 2255, the district court denied the application without hearing, and this appeal followed.

Warren argues that his rights pertaining to the assignment of counsel to assist him in the criminal proceedings, as provided for in Rule 44, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Sixth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. United States v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. George ChrisosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  4. United States v. RozancCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Marc A. SnoddyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. State v. GoodrichIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kenneth Michael Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. Richard E. Walsh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. Perry v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API