Legal Opinion

United States v. Rozanc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 20, 1964No. Nos. 14299, 14300, 14337PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

These three appeals may be disposed of adequately in this single brief opinion. The appellants have alleged that they were deprived of their constitutional rights. We think that it is not appropriate to reach that issue at this time in the absence of lawful judgments of sentence. The United States concedes error in that none of the defendants were present in court when each of them was sentenced finally under 18 U.S.C. § 4208 (b). We agree. See United States v. Behrens, U.S., 84 S.Ct. 295 (1963). As to the finality of the judgments of sentence imposed or to be imposed hereafter see Corey v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Corey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ollie Warren v. G. v. Richardson, Warden F.C.I., Lompoc, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. Joseph Louis Rozanc. United States of America v. Carl William Thomas. United States of America v. Ronald Matthew MegoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API