Legal Opinion
Itzen & Robertson v. Bd. of Health of Oakland
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 8, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
89 N.J. Super. 374 (1965)
215 A.2d 60
ITZEN & ROBERTSON, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BOARD OF HEALTH OF THE BOROUGH OF OAKLAND AND ELSIE BARWICK, SECRETARY TO THE BOARD OF HEALTH OF THE BOROUGH OF OAKLAND, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided November 8, 1965.
Mr. Jerome Vogel for plaintiff (Messrs. Jeffer, Walter & Tierney, attorneys).
Mr. Gilbert I. Wasserman for defendants (Messrs. Hirschklau & Wasserman, attorneys).
SCHNEIDER, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Plaintiff and defendants filed motions for summary judgment in the above suit in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Waszen v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Guill v. Mayor and Council of City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Berardi v. RutterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Bd. of Health of Weehawken Tp. v. NY Central R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Hasbrouck Heights Hospital Ass'n v. Borough of Hasbrouck HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Belleville Chamber of Commerce v. Town of BellevilleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967