Legal Opinion

Fish v. Hale

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1857PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hale & Smith brought the action against Fish, in a Justice’s Court, where they declared on the following instrument:

$63. On or before tbe first day of October next, for value received, I promise to pay dharles C. Stevenson or bearer, sixty-three dollars with interest, being a balance due on settlement this day. E. C. Fish.

Sharon, April 25, 1855.

Fish pleaded tbe general issue. The note was filed with the Justice, and tbe cause adjourned.

On tbe second adjournment day, Fish made an affidavit denying tbe execution of tbe note, and asked leave to file the affidavit with tbe Justice, and amend tbe…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Pegg v. BidlemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Towle v. DunhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Bell v. ForemanCircuit Court of the 45th Circuit of Michigan · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API