Legal Opinion
Towle v. Dunham
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Montcalm. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring. error. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
The declaration contains the common counts in assumpsit. The suit was commenced by filing and serving declaration, to which was added a notice that on the trial of the cause the plaintiffs, under the money counts, would give in evidence four certain promissory notes, copies of which were given as follows:
“250. Greenville, Mich., May 27, 1884.
“Ninety days after date we promise to pay to Towle, Douglas & Co., or order, two hundred and fifty dollars, at First National Bank, value received.
“Due Aug. 28. Seaman, Dunham & Co.”
“ $400.' Greenville, Mich., June 20, 1884.
“ Sixty days after date we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McLane v. Placerville & Sacramento Valley R.R.California Supreme Court · 1885
- Kenton Insurance v. McClellanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Pegg v. BidlemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Chicago & Northeastern R. R. v. EdsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Freeman v. EllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Garlick v. Lake Shore Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922