Legal Opinion
Rico v. Xcel Energy, Inc.
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided September 25, 2012No. Civ. No. 12-00038 MV/WPLPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss First *1166Amended Complaint [Doc. 6]. The Court, having considered the motion, briefs, relevant law and being otherwise fully informed, finds that the Motion is well-taken in part and will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
BACKGROUND
For purposes of this motion, the Court accepts as true the facts as alleged in the First Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”). Plaintiff has been an employee of Southwestern Public Service Company (“Southwestern”) since 1999. Doc. 4, ¶ 7.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rawdin v. American Board of PediatricsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Benavidez v. Sandia National LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Goodman v. OS Rest. Servs. LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- Hopkins v. Mwr Mgmt. Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2016
- Tygrett v. City and County of Denver a/k/a Denver WaterDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020