Legal Opinion
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 5, 1956No. 11510PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner seeks to have set aside two related orders of the Federal Power Commission dated July 15, 1954 and July 28, 1954 together with the Commission’s Opinion No. 274 which accompanied the July 28th order. Though nine dockets are involved, all of the proceedings were consolidated by the January 15, 1955 order of the Commission under Docket No. G-2301.
Panhandle is a natural-gas company within the meaning of the Natural Gas Act, Section 2(6), 15 U.S.C.A. § 717a (6), as amended. On May 4, 1950 the Commission issued a certificate of convenience and necessity which…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Boehm v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Louisiana Power & Light Company v. United Gas Pipe Line Company, Federal Power Commission, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, Blue Ridge Gas Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.